Honey, in particular monofloral varieties, is a valuable commodity. Here, we present proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry, PTR-ToF-MS, coupled to chemometrics as a successful tool in the classification of monofloral honeys, which should serve in fraud protection against mispresentation of the floral origin of honey. We analyzed 7 different honey varieties from citrus, chestnut, sunflower, honeydew, robinia, rhododendron and linden tree, in total 70 different honey samples and a total of 206 measurements. Only subtle differences in the profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace of the different honeys could be found. Nevertheless, it was possible to successfully apply 6 different classification methods with a total correct assignment of 81–99% in the internal validation sets. The most successful methods were stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and probabilistic neural network (PNN), giving total correct assignments in the external validation sets of 100 and 90%, respectively. Clearly, PTR-ToF-MS/chemometrics is a powerful tool in honey classification
Schuhfried, E.; Sanchez del Pulgar, J.; Bobba, M.; Piro, R.; Cappellin, L.; Märk, T.D.; Biasioli, F. (2016). Classification of 7 monofloral honey varieties by PTR-ToF-MS direct headspace analysis and chemometrics. TALANTA, 147 (1): 213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.062 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/26477
Classification of 7 monofloral honey varieties by PTR-ToF-MS direct headspace analysis and chemometrics
Cappellin, Luca;Biasioli, Franco
2016-01-01
Abstract
Honey, in particular monofloral varieties, is a valuable commodity. Here, we present proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry, PTR-ToF-MS, coupled to chemometrics as a successful tool in the classification of monofloral honeys, which should serve in fraud protection against mispresentation of the floral origin of honey. We analyzed 7 different honey varieties from citrus, chestnut, sunflower, honeydew, robinia, rhododendron and linden tree, in total 70 different honey samples and a total of 206 measurements. Only subtle differences in the profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace of the different honeys could be found. Nevertheless, it was possible to successfully apply 6 different classification methods with a total correct assignment of 81–99% in the internal validation sets. The most successful methods were stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and probabilistic neural network (PNN), giving total correct assignments in the external validation sets of 100 and 90%, respectively. Clearly, PTR-ToF-MS/chemometrics is a powerful tool in honey classificationFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2016 T Biasioli et al.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.76 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.76 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.