Honey, in particular monofloral varieties, is a valuable commodity. Here, we present proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry, PTR-ToF-MS, coupled to chemometrics as a successful tool in the classification of monofloral honeys, which should serve in fraud protection against mispresentation of the floral origin of honey. We analyzed 7 different honey varieties from citrus, chestnut, sunflower, honeydew, robinia, rhododendron and linden tree, in total 70 different honey samples and a total of 206 measurements. Only subtle differences in the profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace of the different honeys could be found. Nevertheless, it was possible to successfully apply 6 different classification methods with a total correct assignment of 81–99% in the internal validation sets. The most successful methods were stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and probabilistic neural network (PNN), giving total correct assignments in the external validation sets of 100 and 90%, respectively. Clearly, PTR-ToF-MS/chemometrics is a powerful tool in honey classification

Schuhfried, E.; Sanchez del Pulgar, J.; Bobba, M.; Piro, R.; Cappellin, L.; Märk, T.D.; Biasioli, F. (2016). Classification of 7 monofloral honey varieties by PTR-ToF-MS direct headspace analysis and chemometrics. TALANTA, 147 (1): 213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.062 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/26477

Classification of 7 monofloral honey varieties by PTR-ToF-MS direct headspace analysis and chemometrics

Cappellin, Luca;Biasioli, Franco
2016-01-01

Abstract

Honey, in particular monofloral varieties, is a valuable commodity. Here, we present proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry, PTR-ToF-MS, coupled to chemometrics as a successful tool in the classification of monofloral honeys, which should serve in fraud protection against mispresentation of the floral origin of honey. We analyzed 7 different honey varieties from citrus, chestnut, sunflower, honeydew, robinia, rhododendron and linden tree, in total 70 different honey samples and a total of 206 measurements. Only subtle differences in the profiles of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the headspace of the different honeys could be found. Nevertheless, it was possible to successfully apply 6 different classification methods with a total correct assignment of 81–99% in the internal validation sets. The most successful methods were stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and probabilistic neural network (PNN), giving total correct assignments in the external validation sets of 100 and 90%, respectively. Clearly, PTR-ToF-MS/chemometrics is a powerful tool in honey classification
PTR-ToF-MS
Classification
Neural networks
Honey
Floral origin
Settore CHIM/01 - CHIMICA ANALITICA
2016
Schuhfried, E.; Sanchez del Pulgar, J.; Bobba, M.; Piro, R.; Cappellin, L.; Märk, T.D.; Biasioli, F. (2016). Classification of 7 monofloral honey varieties by PTR-ToF-MS direct headspace analysis and chemometrics. TALANTA, 147 (1): 213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.062 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/26477
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016 T Biasioli et al.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.76 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/26477
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact