Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are molecules present in our everyday life, and they can be positive, such as in the formation of odour and food flavour, or harmful to the environment and humans, and research is focusing on limiting their emissions. Various methods have been used to achieve this purpose. Firstly, we review three main degradation methods: activated carbon, photocatalysis and a synergetic system. We provide a general overview of the operative conditions and report the possibility of VOC abatement during cooking. Within the literature, none of these systems has ever been tested in the presence of complex matrices, such as during cooking processes. The aim of this study is to compare the three methods in order to understand the behaviour of filter systems in the case of realistically complex gas mixtures. Proton transfer reaction–mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has been used in the real-time monitoring of volatilome. Due to the fact that VOC emissions are highly dependent on the composition of the food cooked, we evaluated the degradation capacity of the three systems for different burger types (meat, greens, and fish). We demonstrate the pros and cons of photocatalysis and adsorption and how a combined approach can mitigate the drawbacks of photocatalysis

Zatta, D.; Segata, M.; Biasioli, F.; Allegretti, O.; Bochicchio, G.; Verucchi, R.; Chiavarini, F.; Cappellin, L. (2023). Comparative analysis of volatile organic compound purification techniques in complex cooking emissions: adsorption, photocatalysis and combined systems. MOLECULES, 28 (22): 7658. doi: 10.3390/molecules28227658 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/83215

Comparative analysis of volatile organic compound purification techniques in complex cooking emissions: adsorption, photocatalysis and combined systems

Biasioli, F.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are molecules present in our everyday life, and they can be positive, such as in the formation of odour and food flavour, or harmful to the environment and humans, and research is focusing on limiting their emissions. Various methods have been used to achieve this purpose. Firstly, we review three main degradation methods: activated carbon, photocatalysis and a synergetic system. We provide a general overview of the operative conditions and report the possibility of VOC abatement during cooking. Within the literature, none of these systems has ever been tested in the presence of complex matrices, such as during cooking processes. The aim of this study is to compare the three methods in order to understand the behaviour of filter systems in the case of realistically complex gas mixtures. Proton transfer reaction–mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has been used in the real-time monitoring of volatilome. Due to the fact that VOC emissions are highly dependent on the composition of the food cooked, we evaluated the degradation capacity of the three systems for different burger types (meat, greens, and fish). We demonstrate the pros and cons of photocatalysis and adsorption and how a combined approach can mitigate the drawbacks of photocatalysis
PTR-MS
Adsorption
Photocatalysis
Cooking emissions
Settore AGR/15 - SCIENZE E TECNOLOGIE ALIMENTARI
2023
Zatta, D.; Segata, M.; Biasioli, F.; Allegretti, O.; Bochicchio, G.; Verucchi, R.; Chiavarini, F.; Cappellin, L. (2023). Comparative analysis of volatile organic compound purification techniques in complex cooking emissions: adsorption, photocatalysis and combined systems. MOLECULES, 28 (22): 7658. doi: 10.3390/molecules28227658 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/83215
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023 M Biasioli.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.82 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.82 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/83215
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact