During a survey for isolating sourdough lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 20 dough samples produced at the bakery level (BL) or home-made (HM) were collected. An enzyme-based colorimetric method revealed a total biogenic amines (BAs) concentration in the range 41.4–251.8 ppm for six (three BL and three HM) sourdoughs characterised by unpleasant odours. Eight BAs generally investigated in foods were identified and quantified from these six samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). Only one HM sample contained almost all analysed BAs. Tryptamine was exclusively detected in HM sourdoughs (0.71–24.1 ppm). Putrescine, tryptamine, spermidine, and spermine were the only BAs detected in BL sourdoughs. MiSeq Illumina analysis was applied to study the total bacterial community of sourdoughs. LAB accounted from 67.89 to 92.17% of total bacterial diversity, and Levilactobacillus brevis was identified in all six sourdoughs. Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, and Weissella were also dominant. Plate counts detected neither the presence of Pseudomonas nor members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, and LAB levels were, on average, barely 5.89 Log CFU/g for BL, and 7.33 Log CFU/g for HM sourdoughs. Data suggested that the microorganisms mainly imputable of BAs formation in sourdough are members of the LAB community

Mannino, G.; Cirlincione, F.; Gaglio, R.; Franciosi, E.; Francesca, N.; Moschetti, G.; Asteggiano, A.; Medana, C.; Gentile, C.; Settanni, L. (2022). Preliminary investigation of biogenic amines in type I sourdoughs produced at home and bakery level. TOXINS, 14 (5): 293. doi: 10.3390/toxins14050293 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/74616

Preliminary investigation of biogenic amines in type I sourdoughs produced at home and bakery level

Franciosi, Elena;
2022-01-01

Abstract

During a survey for isolating sourdough lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 20 dough samples produced at the bakery level (BL) or home-made (HM) were collected. An enzyme-based colorimetric method revealed a total biogenic amines (BAs) concentration in the range 41.4–251.8 ppm for six (three BL and three HM) sourdoughs characterised by unpleasant odours. Eight BAs generally investigated in foods were identified and quantified from these six samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). Only one HM sample contained almost all analysed BAs. Tryptamine was exclusively detected in HM sourdoughs (0.71–24.1 ppm). Putrescine, tryptamine, spermidine, and spermine were the only BAs detected in BL sourdoughs. MiSeq Illumina analysis was applied to study the total bacterial community of sourdoughs. LAB accounted from 67.89 to 92.17% of total bacterial diversity, and Levilactobacillus brevis was identified in all six sourdoughs. Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, and Weissella were also dominant. Plate counts detected neither the presence of Pseudomonas nor members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, and LAB levels were, on average, barely 5.89 Log CFU/g for BL, and 7.33 Log CFU/g for HM sourdoughs. Data suggested that the microorganisms mainly imputable of BAs formation in sourdough are members of the LAB community
Biogenic amines
Food safety
UPHLC-MS/MS
Lactic acid bacteria
MiSeq Illumina
Sourdough
Settore AGR/15 - SCIENZE E TECNOLOGIE ALIMENTARI
2022
Mannino, G.; Cirlincione, F.; Gaglio, R.; Franciosi, E.; Francesca, N.; Moschetti, G.; Asteggiano, A.; Medana, C.; Gentile, C.; Settanni, L. (2022). Preliminary investigation of biogenic amines in type I sourdoughs produced at home and bakery level. TOXINS, 14 (5): 293. doi: 10.3390/toxins14050293 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/74616
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 T Franciosi.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 616.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
616.24 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/74616
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact