Aims The partitioning of the total soil CO2 efflux into its two main components: respiration from roots (and root-associated organisms) and microbial respiration (by means of soil organic matter (SOM) and litter decomposition), is a major need in soil carbon dynamics studies in order to understand if a soil is a net sink or source of carbon. Methods The heterotrophic component of the CO2 efflux was estimated for eleven forest sites as the ratio between the carbon stocks of different SOM pools and previously published (Δ14C derived) turnover times. The autotrophic component, including root and root-associated respiration, was calculated by subtracting the heterotrophic component from total soil chamber measured CO2 efflux. Results Results suggested that, on average, ~50% of total soil CO2 efflux was derived from the respiration of the living roots, ~40% from decomposition of the litter layers and less than 10% from decomposition of belowground SOM. Conclusions The Δ14 C method proved to be an efficient tool by which to partition soil CO2 efflux and quantify the contribution of the different components of soil respiration. However the average calculated heterotrophic respiration was statistically lower compared with two previous studies dealing with soil CO2 efflux partitioning. These differences were probably due to a high heterogeneity of the SOM fraction and to a sub-optimal choice of the litter sampling period.

Rodeghiero, M.; Churkina, G.; Martinez, C.; Scholten, T.; Gianelle, D.; Cescatti, A. (2013). Components of forest soil CO2 efflux estimated from Δ14C values of soil organic matter. PLANT AND SOIL, 364 (1): 55-68. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1309-1 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21282

Components of forest soil CO2 efflux estimated from Δ14C values of soil organic matter

Rodeghiero, Mirco;Martinez, Cristina;Gianelle, Damiano;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Aims The partitioning of the total soil CO2 efflux into its two main components: respiration from roots (and root-associated organisms) and microbial respiration (by means of soil organic matter (SOM) and litter decomposition), is a major need in soil carbon dynamics studies in order to understand if a soil is a net sink or source of carbon. Methods The heterotrophic component of the CO2 efflux was estimated for eleven forest sites as the ratio between the carbon stocks of different SOM pools and previously published (Δ14C derived) turnover times. The autotrophic component, including root and root-associated respiration, was calculated by subtracting the heterotrophic component from total soil chamber measured CO2 efflux. Results Results suggested that, on average, ~50% of total soil CO2 efflux was derived from the respiration of the living roots, ~40% from decomposition of the litter layers and less than 10% from decomposition of belowground SOM. Conclusions The Δ14 C method proved to be an efficient tool by which to partition soil CO2 efflux and quantify the contribution of the different components of soil respiration. However the average calculated heterotrophic respiration was statistically lower compared with two previous studies dealing with soil CO2 efflux partitioning. These differences were probably due to a high heterogeneity of the SOM fraction and to a sub-optimal choice of the litter sampling period.
Soil respiration partitioning
Carbon-14 isotope
Soil organic matter fractions
Forest ecosystems
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
2013
Rodeghiero, M.; Churkina, G.; Martinez, C.; Scholten, T.; Gianelle, D.; Cescatti, A. (2013). Components of forest soil CO2 efflux estimated from Δ14C values of soil organic matter. PLANT AND SOIL, 364 (1): 55-68. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1309-1 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21282
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Rodeghiero13_Plant and Soil.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 453.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
453.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/21282
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact