To investigate the influence of different types of fertilizers on quality parameters, N-containing compounds, and the δ15N, δ13C, δ2H, δ 34S, and δ18O values of citrus fruit, a study was performed on the orange fruit cv. ‘Valencia late’ (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck), which was harvested in four plots (three organic and one conventional) located on the same farm. The results demonstrated that different types of organic fertilizers containing the same amount of nitrogen did not effect important changes in orange fruit quality parameters. The levels of total N and N-containing compounds such as synephrine in fruit juice were not statistically different among the different treatments. The δ15N values of orange fruit grown under fertilizer derived from animal origin as well as from vegetable compost were statistically higher than those grown with mineral fertilizer. Therefore, δ15N values can be used as an indicator of citrus fertilization management (organic or conventional), because even when applied organic fertilizers are of different origins, the natural abundance of 15N in organic citrus fruit remains higher than in conventional ones. These treatments also did not effect differences in the δ13C, δ2H, δ34S, and δ18O values of fruit.

Rapisarda, P.; Camin, F.; Fabroni, S.; Perini, M.; Torrisi, B.; Intrigliolo, F. (2010). Influence of different organic fertilizers on quality parameters and the delta N-15, delta C-13, delta H-62, delta S-34, and delta O-18 values of orange fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 58 (6): 3502-3506. doi: 10.1021/jf903952v handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/19473

Influence of different organic fertilizers on quality parameters and the delta N-15, delta C-13, delta H-62, delta S-34, and delta O-18 values of orange fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

Camin, Federica;Perini, Matteo;
2010-01-01

Abstract

To investigate the influence of different types of fertilizers on quality parameters, N-containing compounds, and the δ15N, δ13C, δ2H, δ 34S, and δ18O values of citrus fruit, a study was performed on the orange fruit cv. ‘Valencia late’ (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck), which was harvested in four plots (three organic and one conventional) located on the same farm. The results demonstrated that different types of organic fertilizers containing the same amount of nitrogen did not effect important changes in orange fruit quality parameters. The levels of total N and N-containing compounds such as synephrine in fruit juice were not statistically different among the different treatments. The δ15N values of orange fruit grown under fertilizer derived from animal origin as well as from vegetable compost were statistically higher than those grown with mineral fertilizer. Therefore, δ15N values can be used as an indicator of citrus fertilization management (organic or conventional), because even when applied organic fertilizers are of different origins, the natural abundance of 15N in organic citrus fruit remains higher than in conventional ones. These treatments also did not effect differences in the δ13C, δ2H, δ34S, and δ18O values of fruit.
Citrus
Compost
Manure
Stable isotope
‘Valencia late’ orange
Settore CHIM/10 - CHIMICA DEGLI ALIMENTI
2010
Rapisarda, P.; Camin, F.; Fabroni, S.; Perini, M.; Torrisi, B.; Intrigliolo, F. (2010). Influence of different organic fertilizers on quality parameters and the delta N-15, delta C-13, delta H-62, delta S-34, and delta O-18 values of orange fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 58 (6): 3502-3506. doi: 10.1021/jf903952v handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/19473
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2010 JAFC Camin.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 677.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
677.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/19473
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact