As the share of renewable energy grows worldwide, flexible energy production from peak-operating hydropower and the phenomenon of hydropeaking have received increasing attention. In this study, we collected open research questions from 220 experts in river science, practice, and policy across the globe using an online survey available in six languages related to hydropeaking. We used a systematic method of determining expert consensus (Delphi method) to identify 100 high-priority questions related to the following thematic fields: (a) hydrology, (b) physico-chemical properties of water, (c) river morphology and sediment dynamics, (d) ecology and biology, (e) socio-economic topics, (f) energy markets, (g) policy and regulation, and (h) management and mitigation measures. The consensus list of high-priority questions shall inform and guide researchers in focusing their efforts to foster a better science-policy interface, thereby improving the sustainability of peak-operating hydropower in a variety of settings. We find that there is already a strong understanding of the ecological impact of hydropeaking and efficient mitigation techniques to support sustainable hydropower. Yet, a disconnect remains in its policy and management implementation

Hayes, D.S.; Bruno, M.C.; Alp, M.; Boavida, I.; Batalla, R.J.; Bejarano, M.D.; Noack, M.; Vanzo, D.; Casas-Mulet, R.; Vericat, D.; Carolli, M.; Tonolla, D.; Halleraker, J.H.; Gosselin, M.P.; Chiogna, G.; Zolezzi, G.; Venus, T.E. (2023). 100 key questions to guide hydropeaking research and policy. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 187: 113729. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113729 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/81775

100 key questions to guide hydropeaking research and policy

Bruno, M. C.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

As the share of renewable energy grows worldwide, flexible energy production from peak-operating hydropower and the phenomenon of hydropeaking have received increasing attention. In this study, we collected open research questions from 220 experts in river science, practice, and policy across the globe using an online survey available in six languages related to hydropeaking. We used a systematic method of determining expert consensus (Delphi method) to identify 100 high-priority questions related to the following thematic fields: (a) hydrology, (b) physico-chemical properties of water, (c) river morphology and sediment dynamics, (d) ecology and biology, (e) socio-economic topics, (f) energy markets, (g) policy and regulation, and (h) management and mitigation measures. The consensus list of high-priority questions shall inform and guide researchers in focusing their efforts to foster a better science-policy interface, thereby improving the sustainability of peak-operating hydropower in a variety of settings. We find that there is already a strong understanding of the ecological impact of hydropeaking and efficient mitigation techniques to support sustainable hydropower. Yet, a disconnect remains in its policy and management implementation
Renewable energies
Sustainable development
Flow ramping
Load following
Water resources management
Science-policy interface
Funding
Applied science
Delphi method
Horizon scan
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
2023
Hayes, D.S.; Bruno, M.C.; Alp, M.; Boavida, I.; Batalla, R.J.; Bejarano, M.D.; Noack, M.; Vanzo, D.; Casas-Mulet, R.; Vericat, D.; Carolli, M.; Tonolla, D.; Halleraker, J.H.; Gosselin, M.P.; Chiogna, G.; Zolezzi, G.; Venus, T.E. (2023). 100 key questions to guide hydropeaking research and policy. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 187: 113729. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113729 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/81775
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023 RSER Bruno.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/81775
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact