Genetic diversity is one of the three main levels of biodiversity recognised in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Fundamental for species adaptation to environmental change, genetic diversity is nonetheless under-reported within global and national indicators. When it is reported, the focus is often narrow and confined to domesticated or other commercial species. Several approaches have recently been developed to address this shortfall in reporting on genetic diversity of wild species. While multiplicity of approaches is helpful in any development process, it can also lead to confusion among policy makers and heighten a perception that conservation genetics is too abstract to be of use to organisations and governments. As the developers of five of the different approaches, we have come together to explain how various approaches relate to each other and propose a scorecard, as a unifying reporting mechanism for genetic diversity. Policy implications. We believe the proposed combined approach captures the strengths of its components and is practical for all nations and subnational governments. It is scalable and can be used to evaluate species conservation projects as well as genetic conservation projects.

O'Brien, D.; Laikre, L.; Hoban, S.; Bruford, M.W.; Ekblom, R.; Fischer, M.C.; Hall, J.; Hvilsom, C.; Hollingsworth, P.M.; Kershaw, F.; Mittan, C.S.; Mukassabi, T.; Ogden, R.; Segelbacher, G.; Shaw, R.E.; Vernesi, C.; Macdonald, A.J. (2022). Bringing together approaches to reporting on within species genetic diversity. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 59 (9): 2227-2233. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14225 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/77396

Bringing together approaches to reporting on within species genetic diversity

Vernesi, Cristiano;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Genetic diversity is one of the three main levels of biodiversity recognised in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Fundamental for species adaptation to environmental change, genetic diversity is nonetheless under-reported within global and national indicators. When it is reported, the focus is often narrow and confined to domesticated or other commercial species. Several approaches have recently been developed to address this shortfall in reporting on genetic diversity of wild species. While multiplicity of approaches is helpful in any development process, it can also lead to confusion among policy makers and heighten a perception that conservation genetics is too abstract to be of use to organisations and governments. As the developers of five of the different approaches, we have come together to explain how various approaches relate to each other and propose a scorecard, as a unifying reporting mechanism for genetic diversity. Policy implications. We believe the proposed combined approach captures the strengths of its components and is practical for all nations and subnational governments. It is scalable and can be used to evaluate species conservation projects as well as genetic conservation projects.
Biodiversity
Conservation
Convention on Biological Diversity
Indicators
Monitoring
Policy
Scorecard
Wild species
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
2022
O'Brien, D.; Laikre, L.; Hoban, S.; Bruford, M.W.; Ekblom, R.; Fischer, M.C.; Hall, J.; Hvilsom, C.; Hollingsworth, P.M.; Kershaw, F.; Mittan, C.S.; Mukassabi, T.; Ogden, R.; Segelbacher, G.; Shaw, R.E.; Vernesi, C.; Macdonald, A.J. (2022). Bringing together approaches to reporting on within species genetic diversity. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 59 (9): 2227-2233. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14225 handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/77396
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 JAE Vernesi.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/77396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact