Landscape metrics constitute one of the main tools for the study of the changes of the landscape and of the ecological structure of a region. The most popular software for landscape metrics evaluation is FRAGSTATS, which is free to use but does not have free or open source software (FOSS). Therefore, FOSS implementations, such as QGIS’s LecoS plugin and GRASS’ r.li modules suite, were developed. While metrics are defined in the same way, the “cell neighborhood” parameter, specifying the configuration of the moving window used for the analysis, is managed differently: FRAGSTATS can use values of 4 or 8 (8 is default), LecoS uses 8 and r.li 4. Tests were performed to evaluate the landscape metrics variability depending on the “cell neighborhood” values: some metrics, such as “edge density” and “landscape shape index”, do not change, other, for example “patch number”, “patch density”, and “mean patch area”, vary up to 100% for real maps and 500% for maps built to highlight this variation. A review of the scientific literature was carried out to check how often the value of the “cell neighborhood” parameter is explicitly declared. A method based on the “aggregation index” is proposed to estimate the effect of the uncertainty on the “cell neighborhood” parameter on landscape metrics for different maps

Zatelli, P.; Gobbi, S.; Tattoni, C.; Cantiani, M.G.; La Porta, N.; Rocchini, D.; Zorzi, N.; Ciolli, M. (2019). Relevance of the cell neighborhood size in landscape metrics evaluation and free or open source software implementations. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 8 (12): 586. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8120586 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/68593

Relevance of the cell neighborhood size in landscape metrics evaluation and free or open source software implementations

Gobbi, Stefano;La Porta, Nicola;Rocchini, Duccio;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Landscape metrics constitute one of the main tools for the study of the changes of the landscape and of the ecological structure of a region. The most popular software for landscape metrics evaluation is FRAGSTATS, which is free to use but does not have free or open source software (FOSS). Therefore, FOSS implementations, such as QGIS’s LecoS plugin and GRASS’ r.li modules suite, were developed. While metrics are defined in the same way, the “cell neighborhood” parameter, specifying the configuration of the moving window used for the analysis, is managed differently: FRAGSTATS can use values of 4 or 8 (8 is default), LecoS uses 8 and r.li 4. Tests were performed to evaluate the landscape metrics variability depending on the “cell neighborhood” values: some metrics, such as “edge density” and “landscape shape index”, do not change, other, for example “patch number”, “patch density”, and “mean patch area”, vary up to 100% for real maps and 500% for maps built to highlight this variation. A review of the scientific literature was carried out to check how often the value of the “cell neighborhood” parameter is explicitly declared. A method based on the “aggregation index” is proposed to estimate the effect of the uncertainty on the “cell neighborhood” parameter on landscape metrics for different maps
Landscape metrics
Landscape ecology
Forest landscape
Free and open source geospatial
Map filtering
Settore AGR/05 - ASSESTAMENTO FORESTALE E SELVICOLTURA
2019
Zatelli, P.; Gobbi, S.; Tattoni, C.; Cantiani, M.G.; La Porta, N.; Rocchini, D.; Zorzi, N.; Ciolli, M. (2019). Relevance of the cell neighborhood size in landscape metrics evaluation and free or open source software implementations. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 8 (12): 586. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8120586 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/68593
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019 ISPRS La Porta et al.

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.79 MB
Formato Unknown
3.79 MB Unknown Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/68593
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact