Flow regimes profoundly influence river organisms and ecosystem functions, but regulatory approaches often lack the scientific basis to support sustainable water allocation. In part, this reflects the challenge of understanding the ecological effects of flow variability over different temporal and spatial domains. Here, we use a process‐based distributed hydrological model to simulate 23 years of natural flow regime in 100 bioassessment sites across the Adige River network (NE Italy), and to identify typical nivo‐glacial, nivo‐pluvial, and pluvial reaches. We then applied spatial stream‐network models (SSN) to investigate the relationships between hydrologic and macroinvertebrate metrics while accounting for network spatial autocorrelation and local habitat conditions. Macroinvertebrate metrics correlated most strongly with summer, winter and temporal variation in streamflow, but effects varied across flow regime types. For example: i) taxon richness appeared limited by high summer flows and high winter flows in nivo‐glacial and pluvial streams, respectively; ii) invertebrate grazers increased proportionally with the annual coefficient of flow variation in nivo‐glacial streams but tended to decline with flow variation in pluvial streams. Although local land‐use and water quality also affected benthic communities, most variation in macroinvertebrate metrics was associated with spatial autocorrelation. These findings highlight the importance of developing environmental flow management policies in ways that reflect specific hydro‐ecological and land use contexts. Our analyses also illustrate the importance of spatially‐explicit approaches that account for auto‐correlation when quantifying flow‐ecology relationships.
Larsen, S.; Majone, B.; Zulian, P.; Stella, E.; Bellin, A.; Bruno, M.C.; Zolezzi, G. (2021). Combining hydrologic simulations and stream‐network models to reveal flow‐ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 57 (4): e2020WR028496. doi: 10.1029/2020WR028496 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/67508
Combining hydrologic simulations and stream‐network models to reveal flow‐ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment
Larsen, S.
Primo
;Bruno, M. C.;
2021-01-01
Abstract
Flow regimes profoundly influence river organisms and ecosystem functions, but regulatory approaches often lack the scientific basis to support sustainable water allocation. In part, this reflects the challenge of understanding the ecological effects of flow variability over different temporal and spatial domains. Here, we use a process‐based distributed hydrological model to simulate 23 years of natural flow regime in 100 bioassessment sites across the Adige River network (NE Italy), and to identify typical nivo‐glacial, nivo‐pluvial, and pluvial reaches. We then applied spatial stream‐network models (SSN) to investigate the relationships between hydrologic and macroinvertebrate metrics while accounting for network spatial autocorrelation and local habitat conditions. Macroinvertebrate metrics correlated most strongly with summer, winter and temporal variation in streamflow, but effects varied across flow regime types. For example: i) taxon richness appeared limited by high summer flows and high winter flows in nivo‐glacial and pluvial streams, respectively; ii) invertebrate grazers increased proportionally with the annual coefficient of flow variation in nivo‐glacial streams but tended to decline with flow variation in pluvial streams. Although local land‐use and water quality also affected benthic communities, most variation in macroinvertebrate metrics was associated with spatial autocorrelation. These findings highlight the importance of developing environmental flow management policies in ways that reflect specific hydro‐ecological and land use contexts. Our analyses also illustrate the importance of spatially‐explicit approaches that account for auto‐correlation when quantifying flow‐ecology relationships.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021 WRR Larsen.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.