The accuracy of a map is dependent on the reference dataset used in its construction. Classification analyses used in thematic mapping can, for example, be sensitive to a range of sampling and data quality concerns. With particular focus on the latter, the effects of reference data quality on land cover classifications from airborne thematic mapper data are explored. Variations in sampling intensity and effort are highlighted in a dataset that is widely used in mapping and modelling studies; these may need accounting for in analyses. The quality of the labelling in the reference dataset was also a key variable influencing mapping accuracy. Accuracy varied with the amount and nature of mislabelled training cases with the nature of the effects varying between classifiers. The largest impacts on accuracy occurred when mislabelling involved confusion between similar classes. Accuracy was also typically negatively related to the magnitude of mislabelled cases and the support vector machine (SVM), which has been claimed to be relatively insensitive to training data error, was the most sensitive of the set of classifiers investigated, with overall classification accuracy declining by 8% (significant at 95% level of confidence) with the use of a training set containing 20% mislabelled cases

Foody, G.M.; Pal, M.; Rocchini, D.; Garzon Lopez, C.X.; Bastin, L. (2016). The sensitivity of mapping methods to reference data quality: training supervised image classifications with imperfect reference data. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 5 (11): 199. doi: 10.3390/ijgi5110199 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/35787

The sensitivity of mapping methods to reference data quality: training supervised image classifications with imperfect reference data

Rocchini, Duccio;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The accuracy of a map is dependent on the reference dataset used in its construction. Classification analyses used in thematic mapping can, for example, be sensitive to a range of sampling and data quality concerns. With particular focus on the latter, the effects of reference data quality on land cover classifications from airborne thematic mapper data are explored. Variations in sampling intensity and effort are highlighted in a dataset that is widely used in mapping and modelling studies; these may need accounting for in analyses. The quality of the labelling in the reference dataset was also a key variable influencing mapping accuracy. Accuracy varied with the amount and nature of mislabelled training cases with the nature of the effects varying between classifiers. The largest impacts on accuracy occurred when mislabelling involved confusion between similar classes. Accuracy was also typically negatively related to the magnitude of mislabelled cases and the support vector machine (SVM), which has been claimed to be relatively insensitive to training data error, was the most sensitive of the set of classifiers investigated, with overall classification accuracy declining by 8% (significant at 95% level of confidence) with the use of a training set containing 20% mislabelled cases
Classification
Training
Error
Accuracy
Remote sensing
Land cover
Settore BIO/03 - BOTANICA AMBIENTALE E APPLICATA
2016
Foody, G.M.; Pal, M.; Rocchini, D.; Garzon Lopez, C.X.; Bastin, L. (2016). The sensitivity of mapping methods to reference data quality: training supervised image classifications with imperfect reference data. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 5 (11): 199. doi: 10.3390/ijgi5110199 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/35787
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016 IJGI Rocchini.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 936.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
936.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/35787
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact