In their letter, Halanych et al. (1) criticize our recent assertion (2) that the phylogenetic placement of ctenophores as the sister group to all other animals (the Ctenophora-sister hypothesis) in three previous studies (3⇓–5) was an artifact caused by undetected systematic error.
Pisani, D.; Pett, W.; Dohrmann, M.; Feuda, R.; Rota Stabelli, O.; Philippe, H.; Lartillot, N.; Wörheide, G. (2016). Reply to Halanych et al.: Ctenophore misplacement is corroborated by independent datasets. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 113 (8): E948-E949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525718113 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/33242
Reply to Halanych et al.: Ctenophore misplacement is corroborated by independent datasets
Rota Stabelli, Omar;
2016-01-01
Abstract
In their letter, Halanych et al. (1) criticize our recent assertion (2) that the phylogenetic placement of ctenophores as the sister group to all other animals (the Ctenophora-sister hypothesis) in three previous studies (3⇓–5) was an artifact caused by undetected systematic error.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2016_Pisani_PNAS_HalanychReply.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
149.43 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
149.43 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
