The systematics of the genus BranchipusSchaeffer, 1766 (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) has been based on morphological taxonomy only and thus remains poorly resolved or, at best, questionable. Among the seven species described in the genus, a detailed comparison of Branchipus schaefferiFischer, 1834 with both B. pasaiCottarelli, 1969 and B. visnyaiKertész, 1956 is necessary to clarify their status. The use of morphological characters and, in particular, the appearance of second antennae and antennal appendages in males still cause taxonomic confusion among these three species. Herein, we use two molecular markers (allozymes and mtDNA sequences) and scanning electron microscopy to determine consistent differentiation patterns and test for congruence with the shape of the genus diagnostic trait, the frontal shield. We analyzed specimens belonging to 11 populations and covering a wide geographic distribution: B. pasaifrom Italy, B. schaefferifrom Spain and Morocco, and B. visnyaifrom Malta and Italy. The extent of genetic divergence among populations evaluated by allozyme variation at 13 enzymatic loci and a mtDNA marker suggests the existence of different taxa and the absence of gene flow between them. The molecular results, together with morphological observations, did not provide support for the existing subdivision in the three nominal species B. pasai, B. schaefferi, and B. visnyaiand places the validity of previously proposed taxonomic groups in discussion

Gandolfi, A.; Rossi, V.; Zarattini, P. (2015). Re-evaluation of three related species of the genus Brachipus Schaeffer, 1766 (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) by morphological and genetic analyses. JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 35 (6): 804-813. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002382 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/25455

Re-evaluation of three related species of the genus Brachipus Schaeffer, 1766 (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) by morphological and genetic analyses

Gandolfi, Andrea;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The systematics of the genus BranchipusSchaeffer, 1766 (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) has been based on morphological taxonomy only and thus remains poorly resolved or, at best, questionable. Among the seven species described in the genus, a detailed comparison of Branchipus schaefferiFischer, 1834 with both B. pasaiCottarelli, 1969 and B. visnyaiKertész, 1956 is necessary to clarify their status. The use of morphological characters and, in particular, the appearance of second antennae and antennal appendages in males still cause taxonomic confusion among these three species. Herein, we use two molecular markers (allozymes and mtDNA sequences) and scanning electron microscopy to determine consistent differentiation patterns and test for congruence with the shape of the genus diagnostic trait, the frontal shield. We analyzed specimens belonging to 11 populations and covering a wide geographic distribution: B. pasaifrom Italy, B. schaefferifrom Spain and Morocco, and B. visnyaifrom Malta and Italy. The extent of genetic divergence among populations evaluated by allozyme variation at 13 enzymatic loci and a mtDNA marker suggests the existence of different taxa and the absence of gene flow between them. The molecular results, together with morphological observations, did not provide support for the existing subdivision in the three nominal species B. pasai, B. schaefferi, and B. visnyaiand places the validity of previously proposed taxonomic groups in discussion
Allozymes
Branchipus
Fairy shrimp
Gene flow
Mitochondrial DNA
Morphology
Phylogeny
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
2015
Gandolfi, A.; Rossi, V.; Zarattini, P. (2015). Re-evaluation of three related species of the genus Brachipus Schaeffer, 1766 (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) by morphological and genetic analyses. JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 35 (6): 804-813. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002382 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/25455
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015 JCB Gandolfi.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.2 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/25455
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact