Simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems has been a major challenge in quantifying the global carbon cycle. Many different light use efficiency (LUE) models have been developed recently, but our understanding of the relative merits of different models remains limited. Using CO2 flux measurements from multiple eddy covariance sites, we here compared and assessed major algorithms and performance of seven LUE models (CASA, CFix, CFlux, EC-LUE, MODIS, VPM and VPRM). Comparison between simulated GPP and estimated GPP from flux measurements showed that model performance differed substantially among ecosystem types. In general, most models performed better in capturing the temporal changes and magnitude of GPP in deciduous broadleaf forests and mixed forests than in evergreen broadleaf forests and shrublands. Six of the seven LUE models significantly underestimated GPP during cloudy days because the impacts of diffuse radiation on light use efficiency were ignored in the models. CFlux and EC-LUE exhibited the lowest root mean square error among all models at 80% and 75% of the sites, respectively. Moreover, these two models showed better performance than others in simulating interannual variability of GPP. Two pairwise comparisons revealed that the seven models differed substantially in algorithms describing the environmental regulations, particularly water stress, on GPP. This analysis highlights the need to improve representation of the impacts of diffuse radiation and water stress in the LUE models

Yuan, W.; Cai, W.; Xia, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Dong, W.; Merbold, L.; Law, B.; Arain, A.; Beringer, J.; Bernhofer, C.; Black, A.; Blanken, P.D.; Cescatti, A.; Chen, Y.; Francois, L.; Gianelle, D.; Janssens, I.A.; Jung, M.; Kato, T.; Kiely, G.; Liu, D.; Marcolla, B.; Montagnani, L.; Raschi, A.; Roupsard, O.; Varlagin, A.; Wohlfahrt, G. (2014). Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 192-193: 108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.007 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/23836

Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database

Gianelle, Damiano;Marcolla, Barbara;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems has been a major challenge in quantifying the global carbon cycle. Many different light use efficiency (LUE) models have been developed recently, but our understanding of the relative merits of different models remains limited. Using CO2 flux measurements from multiple eddy covariance sites, we here compared and assessed major algorithms and performance of seven LUE models (CASA, CFix, CFlux, EC-LUE, MODIS, VPM and VPRM). Comparison between simulated GPP and estimated GPP from flux measurements showed that model performance differed substantially among ecosystem types. In general, most models performed better in capturing the temporal changes and magnitude of GPP in deciduous broadleaf forests and mixed forests than in evergreen broadleaf forests and shrublands. Six of the seven LUE models significantly underestimated GPP during cloudy days because the impacts of diffuse radiation on light use efficiency were ignored in the models. CFlux and EC-LUE exhibited the lowest root mean square error among all models at 80% and 75% of the sites, respectively. Moreover, these two models showed better performance than others in simulating interannual variability of GPP. Two pairwise comparisons revealed that the seven models differed substantially in algorithms describing the environmental regulations, particularly water stress, on GPP. This analysis highlights the need to improve representation of the impacts of diffuse radiation and water stress in the LUE models
Gross primary production
Light use efficiency
Seven LUE models
Settore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA
2014
Yuan, W.; Cai, W.; Xia, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Dong, W.; Merbold, L.; Law, B.; Arain, A.; Beringer, J.; Bernhofer, C.; Black, A.; Blanken, P.D.; Cescatti, A.; Chen, Y.; Francois, L.; Gianelle, D.; Janssens, I.A.; Jung, M.; Kato, T.; Kiely, G.; Liu, D.; Marcolla, B.; Montagnani, L.; Raschi, A.; Roupsard, O.; Varlagin, A.; Wohlfahrt, G. (2014). Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 192-193: 108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.007 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/23836
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014 AFM Marcolla Gianelle.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.87 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/23836
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 235
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 216
social impact