The investigation of hypothetical bias in choice experiments (CEs) has typically been conducted in the laboratory with only minimal field experiments. Moreover, it is common practice to provide an initial endowment (money or coupons) to respondents. In this research, we employed a between-subject CE in a supermarket with three different treatments (i.e. hypothetical, hypothetical with cheap talk script and real). With the ‘real’ treatment, we required respondents to use their own money when making a payment. The proposed incentive-compatible mechanism mimics as close as possible the everyday purchasing situation. Results confirm the presence of hypothetical bias and the mixed effectiveness of a cheap talk script

Moser, R.; Raffaelli, R.; Notaro, S. (2014). Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice xperiment using respondents’ own money. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 41 (1): 25-46. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbt016 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/22461

Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice xperiment using respondents’ own money

Moser, Riccarda;
2014-01-01

Abstract

The investigation of hypothetical bias in choice experiments (CEs) has typically been conducted in the laboratory with only minimal field experiments. Moreover, it is common practice to provide an initial endowment (money or coupons) to respondents. In this research, we employed a between-subject CE in a supermarket with three different treatments (i.e. hypothetical, hypothetical with cheap talk script and real). With the ‘real’ treatment, we required respondents to use their own money when making a payment. The proposed incentive-compatible mechanism mimics as close as possible the everyday purchasing situation. Results confirm the presence of hypothetical bias and the mixed effectiveness of a cheap talk script
Hypothetical bias
Real choice experiment
Own money
Cheap talk
Apples
2014
Moser, R.; Raffaelli, R.; Notaro, S. (2014). Testing hypothetical bias with a real choice xperiment using respondents’ own money. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 41 (1): 25-46. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbt016 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/22461
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014 ERAE Moser et al.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 304 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
304 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/22461
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact