The implications of extensive variation in leaf size for biomass distribution between physiological and support tissues and for overall leaf physiological activity are poorly understood. Here, we tested the hypotheses that increases in leaf size result in enhanced whole-plant support investments, especially in compound-leaved species, and that accumulation of support tissues reduces average leaf nitrogen (N) content per unit dry mass (NM), a proxy for photosynthetic capacity. Leaf biomass partitioning among the lamina, mid-rib and petiole, and whole-plant investments in leaf support (within-leaf and stem) were studied in 33 simple-leaved and 11 compound-leaved species. Support investments in mid-ribs and petioles increased with leaf size similarly in simple leaves and leaflets of compound leaves, but the overall support mass fraction within leaves was larger in compound-leaved species as a result of prominent rachises. Within-leaf and within-plant support mass investments were negatively correlated. Therefore, the total plant support fraction was independent of leaf size and lamina dissection. Because of the lower NM of support biomass, the difference in NM between the entire leaf and the photosynthetic lamina increased with leaf size. We conclude that whole-plant support costs are weakly size-dependent, but accumulation of support structures within the leaf decreases whole-leaf average NM, potentially reducing the integrated photosynthetic activity of larger leaves.

Niinemets, Ü.; Portsmuth, A.; Tobias, M. (2006). Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 171 (1): 91-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21634

Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants

Niinemets, Ülo;
2006-01-01

Abstract

The implications of extensive variation in leaf size for biomass distribution between physiological and support tissues and for overall leaf physiological activity are poorly understood. Here, we tested the hypotheses that increases in leaf size result in enhanced whole-plant support investments, especially in compound-leaved species, and that accumulation of support tissues reduces average leaf nitrogen (N) content per unit dry mass (NM), a proxy for photosynthetic capacity. Leaf biomass partitioning among the lamina, mid-rib and petiole, and whole-plant investments in leaf support (within-leaf and stem) were studied in 33 simple-leaved and 11 compound-leaved species. Support investments in mid-ribs and petioles increased with leaf size similarly in simple leaves and leaflets of compound leaves, but the overall support mass fraction within leaves was larger in compound-leaved species as a result of prominent rachises. Within-leaf and within-plant support mass investments were negatively correlated. Therefore, the total plant support fraction was independent of leaf size and lamina dissection. Because of the lower NM of support biomass, the difference in NM between the entire leaf and the photosynthetic lamina increased with leaf size. We conclude that whole-plant support costs are weakly size-dependent, but accumulation of support structures within the leaf decreases whole-leaf average NM, potentially reducing the integrated photosynthetic activity of larger leaves.
Leaf size
Leaf structure
Nitrogen content
Size–function spectrum
Support costs
2006
Niinemets, Ü.; Portsmuth, A.; Tobias, M. (2006). Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 171 (1): 91-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21634
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2006 NP Niinemets et al.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 591.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
591.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/21634
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 161
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 131
social impact