1. We analysed the canopy and understorey communities of flies in the family Tachinidae, the most diverse group of parasitoid Diptera, in a small and isolated temperate plain forest in northern Italy. Our objective was to assess whether and how these communities differ from one another, and how species distribution relates to forest structure, host distribution, mating sites, and season. 2. The study was carried out in 2008 with 14 Malaise traps installed between April and November in an equal number of sites randomly selected inside the forest, seven on the ground and seven in the tree canopy. 3. Overall species richness, abundance, and turnover were greater in the understorey traps, but most diversity metrics indicate greater overall diversity and evenness in the canopy traps. Community ordination and estimates of beta diversity indicate that the two habitat-associated communities are distinct and should both be considered in assessments of insect diversity and community structure. Indicator species values revealed the presence of a number of species that were effective indicators of canopy and understorey habitats. No strong male bias in canopy traps was observed across species; however, the only significant sex ratio biases in the canopy were towards males. Both male and female biases were observed in understorey traps, depending upon the species.

Stireman, J.O.; Cerretti, P.; Whitmore, D.; Hardersen, S.; Gianelle, D. (2012). Composition and stratification of a tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid community in a European temperate plain forest. INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 5 (5): 346-357. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00168.x handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21532

Composition and stratification of a tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid community in a European temperate plain forest

Gianelle, Damiano
2012-01-01

Abstract

1. We analysed the canopy and understorey communities of flies in the family Tachinidae, the most diverse group of parasitoid Diptera, in a small and isolated temperate plain forest in northern Italy. Our objective was to assess whether and how these communities differ from one another, and how species distribution relates to forest structure, host distribution, mating sites, and season. 2. The study was carried out in 2008 with 14 Malaise traps installed between April and November in an equal number of sites randomly selected inside the forest, seven on the ground and seven in the tree canopy. 3. Overall species richness, abundance, and turnover were greater in the understorey traps, but most diversity metrics indicate greater overall diversity and evenness in the canopy traps. Community ordination and estimates of beta diversity indicate that the two habitat-associated communities are distinct and should both be considered in assessments of insect diversity and community structure. Indicator species values revealed the presence of a number of species that were effective indicators of canopy and understorey habitats. No strong male bias in canopy traps was observed across species; however, the only significant sex ratio biases in the canopy were towards males. Both male and female biases were observed in understorey traps, depending upon the species.
Arthropod diversity
Beta diversity
Canopy arthropods
Community structure
Forest structure
Parasitoid-host associations
Phenology
Sex ratio
2012
Stireman, J.O.; Cerretti, P.; Whitmore, D.; Hardersen, S.; Gianelle, D. (2012). Composition and stratification of a tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid community in a European temperate plain forest. INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 5 (5): 346-357. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00168.x handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21532
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2012 ICD Stireman et al.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 690.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
690.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/21532
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact