Peak-operating hydropower and hydropeaking have received increasing attention in the last two decades. However, knowledge gaps remain, and the transfer of science into mitigation actions and policy-making is still scarce. In this study, we undertook an online survey available in six languages to gather open research questions from more than 200 hydropeaking experts across the globe. We then used a systematic method of determining expert consensus, the Delphi method, to identify the top 100 key questions out of over 400 submitted ones related to eight thematic fields: (i) hydrology, (ii) physicochemical properties of water, (iii) river morphology and sedimentology, (iv) ecology and biology, (v) socioeconomic topics, (vi) energy markets, (vii) policy and regulation, and (viii) management and mitigation measures. The high-priority questions agreed upon by consensus target research objectives that are both achievable and answerable, covering a broad range of topics. The list of questions thereby serves as a useful tool to direct researchers towards enhancing the science-policy interface, aiming to bolster the sustainability of peak-operating hydropower in diverse geographical and socioeconomic settings. 79

Hayes, D.S.; Bruno, M.C.; Alp, M.; Boavida, I.; Batalla, R.J.; Bejarano, M.D.; Noack, M.; Vanzo, D.; Casas-Mulet, R.; Vericat, D.; Carolli, M.; Tonolla, D.; Halleraker, J.H.; Gosselin, M.P.; Chiogna, G.; Zolezzi, G.; Venus, T.E. (2023). Research priorities in hydropeaking. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainability in Hydropower: ecological mitigation, best practices and governance, Trondheim, Norway, 13-15 June 2023: 79. ISBN: 9788282892032. handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/88838

Research priorities in hydropeaking

Bruno, M. C.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Peak-operating hydropower and hydropeaking have received increasing attention in the last two decades. However, knowledge gaps remain, and the transfer of science into mitigation actions and policy-making is still scarce. In this study, we undertook an online survey available in six languages to gather open research questions from more than 200 hydropeaking experts across the globe. We then used a systematic method of determining expert consensus, the Delphi method, to identify the top 100 key questions out of over 400 submitted ones related to eight thematic fields: (i) hydrology, (ii) physicochemical properties of water, (iii) river morphology and sedimentology, (iv) ecology and biology, (v) socioeconomic topics, (vi) energy markets, (vii) policy and regulation, and (viii) management and mitigation measures. The high-priority questions agreed upon by consensus target research objectives that are both achievable and answerable, covering a broad range of topics. The list of questions thereby serves as a useful tool to direct researchers towards enhancing the science-policy interface, aiming to bolster the sustainability of peak-operating hydropower in diverse geographical and socioeconomic settings. 79
9788282892032
2023
Hayes, D.S.; Bruno, M.C.; Alp, M.; Boavida, I.; Batalla, R.J.; Bejarano, M.D.; Noack, M.; Vanzo, D.; Casas-Mulet, R.; Vericat, D.; Carolli, M.; Tonolla, D.; Halleraker, J.H.; Gosselin, M.P.; Chiogna, G.; Zolezzi, G.; Venus, T.E. (2023). Research priorities in hydropeaking. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainability in Hydropower: ecological mitigation, best practices and governance, Trondheim, Norway, 13-15 June 2023: 79. ISBN: 9788282892032. handle: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/88838
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023 SUSHP Bruno 79.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 522.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.35 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/88838
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact