A field trial of integrated management against D. suzukii was carried out in a blueberry orchard in Trentino region. Mass trapping with red traps containing an attractive based on apple vinegar (Droskidrink) was used for the entire plot. Treatments were: Spada 200 EC, Laser and Boundary. For each treatment two applications were done at the same time. Assessments were made on fruits picked every 3-7 days during all the harvest time, checking egg’s deposition of D. suzukii and the emerging adults from berries. The insects caught in the traps were also weekly counted. The damage observed on the three treatments was always similar and low during all the harvest time, reaching high values only in the last assessment, at the end of harvesting (90% of production already picked). A semi-field trial was carried out to verify whether the 3 protection strategies were really equally effective. Fruits were collected 7 days after the last insecticide application and keep for 24 hours with D. suzukii reared in the laboratory. At the end of this period, oviposition and the development of adults was verified. The oviposition was not significantly different between treatments, even if the Boundary treated fruits showed a presence about twice of eggs compared with the insecticides (Spada 200 EC, Laser). The number of emerged adults showed evident differences between treatments. Spada 200 EC was the most effective, showing a lower development of adults, while Boundary was the less effective. Laser showed an intermediate efficacy. The three strategies showed a different efficacy in the semi-field trial and were similar in the field. These results could be explained with the presence of mass trapping in the orchard, which covered the differences between treatments emerged in the semi-field experiment. The arrangement of mass traps, carried out on the perimeter of a plot of limited area, has certainly enhanced their effectiveness. The traps were disposed at a distance of two meters each other and this resulted in a concentration, within the experimental plot, higher than in the bigger orchards. The efficacy demonstrated by this technique requires to consider it as the primary tool in the management of D. suzukii on blueberry

Profaizer, D.; Grassi, A.; Zadra, E.; Maistri, S. (2014). Efficacy of different protection strategies against Drosophila suzukii in combination with mass trapping. In: IOBC VIII Workshop on Integrated Soft Fruit Production, Vigalzano di Pergine, (TN), Italy, 26-28 May 2014: 122. handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/23699

Efficacy of different protection strategies against Drosophila suzukii in combination with mass trapping

Profaizer, Davide;Grassi, Alberto;Maistri, Simone
2014-01-01

Abstract

A field trial of integrated management against D. suzukii was carried out in a blueberry orchard in Trentino region. Mass trapping with red traps containing an attractive based on apple vinegar (Droskidrink) was used for the entire plot. Treatments were: Spada 200 EC, Laser and Boundary. For each treatment two applications were done at the same time. Assessments were made on fruits picked every 3-7 days during all the harvest time, checking egg’s deposition of D. suzukii and the emerging adults from berries. The insects caught in the traps were also weekly counted. The damage observed on the three treatments was always similar and low during all the harvest time, reaching high values only in the last assessment, at the end of harvesting (90% of production already picked). A semi-field trial was carried out to verify whether the 3 protection strategies were really equally effective. Fruits were collected 7 days after the last insecticide application and keep for 24 hours with D. suzukii reared in the laboratory. At the end of this period, oviposition and the development of adults was verified. The oviposition was not significantly different between treatments, even if the Boundary treated fruits showed a presence about twice of eggs compared with the insecticides (Spada 200 EC, Laser). The number of emerged adults showed evident differences between treatments. Spada 200 EC was the most effective, showing a lower development of adults, while Boundary was the less effective. Laser showed an intermediate efficacy. The three strategies showed a different efficacy in the semi-field trial and were similar in the field. These results could be explained with the presence of mass trapping in the orchard, which covered the differences between treatments emerged in the semi-field experiment. The arrangement of mass traps, carried out on the perimeter of a plot of limited area, has certainly enhanced their effectiveness. The traps were disposed at a distance of two meters each other and this resulted in a concentration, within the experimental plot, higher than in the bigger orchards. The efficacy demonstrated by this technique requires to consider it as the primary tool in the management of D. suzukii on blueberry
Drosophila suzukii
Mass trapping
Blueberry
Droskidrink
2014
Profaizer, D.; Grassi, A.; Zadra, E.; Maistri, S. (2014). Efficacy of different protection strategies against Drosophila suzukii in combination with mass trapping. In: IOBC VIII Workshop on Integrated Soft Fruit Production, Vigalzano di Pergine, (TN), Italy, 26-28 May 2014: 122. handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/23699
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014 IOBC Profaizer.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 655.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
655.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/23699
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact