Active learning typically aims at minimizing the number of labeled samples to be included in the training set to reach a certain level of classification accuracy. Standard methods do not usually take into account the real annotation procedures and implicitly assume that all samples require the same effort to be labeled. Here, we consider the case where the cost associated with the annotation of a given sample depends on the previously labeled samples. In general, this is the case when annotating a queried sample is an action that changes the state of a dynamic system, and the cost is a function of the state of the system. In order to minimize the total annotation cost, the active sample selection problem is addressed in the framework of a Markov decision process, which allows one to plan the next labeling action on the basis of an expected long-term cumulative reward. This framework allows us to address the problem of optimizing the collection of labeled samples by field surveys for the classification of remote sensing data. The proposed method is applied to the ground sample collection for tree species classification using airborne hyperspectral images. Experiments carried out in the context of a real case study on forest inventory show the effectiveness of the proposed method

Persello, C.; Boularias, A.; Dalponte, M.; Gobakken, T.; Næsset, E.; Schölkopf, B. (2014). Cost-sensitive active learning with lookahead: optimizing field surveys for remote sensing data classification. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 52 (10): 6652-6664. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2300189 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/24040

Cost-sensitive active learning with lookahead: optimizing field surveys for remote sensing data classification

Dalponte, Michele;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Active learning typically aims at minimizing the number of labeled samples to be included in the training set to reach a certain level of classification accuracy. Standard methods do not usually take into account the real annotation procedures and implicitly assume that all samples require the same effort to be labeled. Here, we consider the case where the cost associated with the annotation of a given sample depends on the previously labeled samples. In general, this is the case when annotating a queried sample is an action that changes the state of a dynamic system, and the cost is a function of the state of the system. In order to minimize the total annotation cost, the active sample selection problem is addressed in the framework of a Markov decision process, which allows one to plan the next labeling action on the basis of an expected long-term cumulative reward. This framework allows us to address the problem of optimizing the collection of labeled samples by field surveys for the classification of remote sensing data. The proposed method is applied to the ground sample collection for tree species classification using airborne hyperspectral images. Experiments carried out in the context of a real case study on forest inventory show the effectiveness of the proposed method
Active Learning
Markov decision process (MDP)
Field Surveys
Forest inventories
Hyperspectral data
Image Classification
Support Vector Machine (SVM)
Settore ING-INF/03 - TELECOMUNICAZIONI
2014
Persello, C.; Boularias, A.; Dalponte, M.; Gobakken, T.; Næsset, E.; Schölkopf, B. (2014). Cost-sensitive active learning with lookahead: optimizing field surveys for remote sensing data classification. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 52 (10): 6652-6664. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2300189 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/24040
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
06729084.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.63 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/24040
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact