Epiphytic lichens have long been used as ecological indicators. Lichen biomonitoring surveys were carried out by five experienced teams and the results compared across the entire process, from sampling design planning to species counting. The five teams received the same background information and worked in parallel but independently in the same area. European standard operating procedures (SOPs), which are still in preparation, were followed in order to identify possible critical issues and improve consistency. Five exercises with progressive reduction in the degree of operational freedom were carried out by the teams. The results revealed differences between teams on each exercise and showed that investigations run by different teams in the same area and at the same time may not be entirely comparable. This was partly due to inherent differences between crews (skills, familiarity with local flora, and accuracy in applying SOPs), partly to ambiguities in the SOPs, and partly to insufficient training with the SOPs. The results may be valuable in improving biomonitoring procedures and in achieving high-quality, consistent lichen diversity data

Brunialti, G.; Frati, L.; Cristofolini, F.; Chiarucci, A.; Giordani, P.; Loppi, S.; Benesperi, R.; Cristofori, A.; Critelli, P.; Di Capua, E.; Genovesi, V.; Gottardini, E.; Innocenti, G.; Munzi, S.; Paoli, L.; Pisani, T.; Ravera, S.; Ferretti, M. (2012). Can we compare lichen diversity data? A test with skilled teams. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 23: 509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.007 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21038

Can we compare lichen diversity data? A test with skilled teams

Cristofolini, Fabiana;Cristofori, Antonella;Gottardini, Elena;
2012-01-01

Abstract

Epiphytic lichens have long been used as ecological indicators. Lichen biomonitoring surveys were carried out by five experienced teams and the results compared across the entire process, from sampling design planning to species counting. The five teams received the same background information and worked in parallel but independently in the same area. European standard operating procedures (SOPs), which are still in preparation, were followed in order to identify possible critical issues and improve consistency. Five exercises with progressive reduction in the degree of operational freedom were carried out by the teams. The results revealed differences between teams on each exercise and showed that investigations run by different teams in the same area and at the same time may not be entirely comparable. This was partly due to inherent differences between crews (skills, familiarity with local flora, and accuracy in applying SOPs), partly to ambiguities in the SOPs, and partly to insufficient training with the SOPs. The results may be valuable in improving biomonitoring procedures and in achieving high-quality, consistent lichen diversity data
Biomonitoring
Epiphytic lichens
Quality assurance
Sources of variability
Standard operating procedures
Biomomitoraggio
Licheni epifiti
Settore BIO/03 - BOTANICA AMBIENTALE E APPLICATA
2012
Brunialti, G.; Frati, L.; Cristofolini, F.; Chiarucci, A.; Giordani, P.; Loppi, S.; Benesperi, R.; Cristofori, A.; Critelli, P.; Di Capua, E.; Genovesi, V.; Gottardini, E.; Innocenti, G.; Munzi, S.; Paoli, L.; Pisani, T.; Ravera, S.; Ferretti, M. (2012). Can we compare lichen diversity data? A test with skilled teams. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 23: 509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.007 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/21038
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2012 EI Brunialti et al.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 512.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
512.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/21038
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact