Brain and behavioural lateralization at the population level has been recently hypothesized to have evolved under social selective pressures as a strategy to optimize coordination among asymmetrical individuals. Evidence for this hypothesis have been collected in Hymenoptera: eusocial honey bees showed olfactory lateralization at the population level, whereas solitary mason bees only showed individual-level olfactory lateralization. Here we investigated lateralization of odour detection and learning in the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris L., an annual eusocial species of Hymenoptera. By training bumble bees on the proboscis extension reflex paradigm with only one antenna in use, we provided the very first evidence of asymmetrical performance favouring the right antenna in responding to learned odours in this species. Electroantennographic responses did not reveal significant antennal asymmetries in odour detection, whereas morphological counting of olfactory sensilla showed a predominance in the number of olfactory sensilla trichodea type A in the right antenna. The occurrence of a population level asymmetry in olfactory learning of bumble bee provides new information on the relationship between social behaviour and the evolution of population-level asymmetries in animals

Anfora, G.; Rigosi, E.; Frasnelli, E.; Ruga, V.; Trona, F.; Vallortigara, G. (2011-04-27). Lateralization in the invertebrate brain: left-right asymmetry of olfaction in bumble bee, Bombus terrestris. PLOS ONE, 6 (4): e18903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018903 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/19962

Lateralization in the invertebrate brain: left-right asymmetry of olfaction in bumble bee, Bombus terrestris

Anfora, Gianfranco;Rigosi, Elisa;Trona, Federica;
2011-04-27

Abstract

Brain and behavioural lateralization at the population level has been recently hypothesized to have evolved under social selective pressures as a strategy to optimize coordination among asymmetrical individuals. Evidence for this hypothesis have been collected in Hymenoptera: eusocial honey bees showed olfactory lateralization at the population level, whereas solitary mason bees only showed individual-level olfactory lateralization. Here we investigated lateralization of odour detection and learning in the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris L., an annual eusocial species of Hymenoptera. By training bumble bees on the proboscis extension reflex paradigm with only one antenna in use, we provided the very first evidence of asymmetrical performance favouring the right antenna in responding to learned odours in this species. Electroantennographic responses did not reveal significant antennal asymmetries in odour detection, whereas morphological counting of olfactory sensilla showed a predominance in the number of olfactory sensilla trichodea type A in the right antenna. The occurrence of a population level asymmetry in olfactory learning of bumble bee provides new information on the relationship between social behaviour and the evolution of population-level asymmetries in animals
Hymenoptera
Brain asymmetry
Olfactory learning
Electroantennography
Social interactions
Imenotteri
Asimmetria cerebrale
Apprendimento olfattivo
Elettroantennografia
Interazioni sociali
27-apr-2011
Anfora, G.; Rigosi, E.; Frasnelli, E.; Ruga, V.; Trona, F.; Vallortigara, G. (2011-04-27). Lateralization in the invertebrate brain: left-right asymmetry of olfaction in bumble bee, Bombus terrestris. PLOS ONE, 6 (4): e18903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018903 handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10449/19962
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pone.0018903.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.42 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10449/19962
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact